About AI & LLM Penetration Testing
AI and LLM penetration testing to identify and validate real risks across LLM apps, RAG pipelines, and AI integrations.
AI and LLM penetration testing to identify and validate real risks across LLM apps, RAG pipelines, and AI integrations.
Yes. The engagement includes identifying potential weaknesses and validating whether they can be exploited in practice.
Testing includes LLM-based applications, RAG systems, agent-based architectures, and AI integrations with backend services.
No. Testing can be performed through exposed interfaces, though additional access can expand coverage.
Yes. Testing includes APIs, plugins, agents, and backend integrations.
Yes. Where applicable, testing includes agent workflows, tool usage, and multi-step autonomous behavior.
Scope typically includes AI interfaces, prompt handling, memory, retrieval systems, and integrations. Final scope is defined during engagement setup.
Yes. Retesting is included as part of the engagement to verify that identified issues have been resolved.
A report with validated findings, including reproduction steps, impact, remediation guidance, and mappings to CWE, CVSS, OWASP, and CVE where applicable.
AI and Large Language Model (LLM) Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) to identify and validate real security risks across LLM applications, RAG pipelines, and AI integrations.
AI & LLM Penetration Testing focuses on identifying weaknesses in how AI systems process inputs, manage context, and interact with external tools, data sources, and backend systems.
The assessment evaluates how prompts can be manipulated, how context can be influenced, and how integrations can be abused to alter system behavior, expose sensitive data, or trigger unintended actions. This includes testing how AI systems handle instructions, memory, retrieval mechanisms, and downstream execution paths.
The objective is to determine how AI-driven systems can be manipulated in practice, what data can be accessed or leaked, and how workflows can be influenced beyond intended controls. Findings are validated to ensure they represent real and actionable risk.
Weaknesses are assessed across inputs, context, memory, and integrations, focusing on how issues such as prompt injection, context poisoning, or tool misuse can be combined to extract data, bypass controls, or trigger unintended actions across the system.
Identifies how AI behavior can be manipulated through inputs, context, and integrations.
Highlights weaknesses that lead to data exposure, control bypass, or unintended execution.
Shows how vulnerabilities affect responses, memory, retrieval, and backend actions.
Reflects how AI systems behave under adversarial interaction conditions.
A structured review of how AI systems process inputs, manage context, and interact with integrations to identify conditions that lead to unintended behavior, data exposure, or unsafe execution.
Testing begins with understanding how the AI system is structured, then focuses on manipulating inputs, context, and integrations to identify where controls fail under adversarial conditions.
Tell us what needs to be tested. We will define scope, coverage, and approach based on your AI architecture.