About Security Architecture Review
Security architecture review to identify design flaws, trust boundary risks, and architectural weaknesses before implementation.
Security architecture review to identify design flaws, trust boundary risks, and architectural weaknesses before implementation.
It can be performed at any stage, but is most effective during design or early implementation.
Any available documentation such as architecture diagrams, data flows, or design specifications can be used. The depth of the review depends on the level of detail provided.
Yes. A targeted review can be performed on specific changes or components. However, a broader review is recommended to fully understand system context, dependencies, and potential security impact.
No. The review is based on architecture and design documentation rather than code.
No. It complements penetration testing by identifying risks before implementation, while penetration testing validates runtime behavior.
Yes. The review can be conducted on existing systems to identify architectural weaknesses and improvement opportunities.
Yes. Threat modeling is included to identify potential attack scenarios based on system design and trust boundaries.
Duration depends on system complexity, number of components, and depth of analysis required.
The assessment includes actionable recommendations to improve architecture, control placement, and overall security design.
Assessment of system architecture, trust boundaries, and data flows to identify security risks and prevent weaknesses before they reach production.
Security Architecture Review (SAR) focuses on identifying security weaknesses, design flaws, and architectural risks before and during implementation by analyzing how systems are designed rather than how they behave at runtime.
The review evaluates High-Level Design (HLD), Low-Level Design (LLD), and system design artifacts across applications, APIs, cloud environments, on-premises systems, hybrid architectures, and integrations. It focuses on how trust is established, how data flows across systems, and how security controls are applied across distributed components.
Using an attacker-centric approach, the objective is to identify insecure design decisions, implicit trust assumptions, and systemic weaknesses that could lead to exploitable conditions once implemented.
Architectural components, trust boundaries, and workflows are analyzed to demonstrate how design-level weaknesses can be combined into attack paths that lead to unauthorized access, data exposure, or privilege escalation once deployed.
Detects design flaws before implementation or deployment.
Fixing issues at design stage avoids costly rework later.
Ensures controls are correctly placed across system components.
Evaluates how attackers would abuse architectural decisions.
A structured review of how system architecture, trust boundaries, and control placement introduce potential security risks across applications and infrastructure.
The review is conducted through structured analysis of architecture and design artifacts, focusing on how decisions can be abused from an attacker perspective once implemented.
Tell us about your architecture. We will identify risks and help you build it securely.